Using cruise control uses more fuel than not using it. I've had this discussion on here before, not meaning to be rude, but believe it or not. Try for yourself.Originally Posted by dainese
Using cruise control uses more fuel than not using it. I've had this discussion on here before, not meaning to be rude, but believe it or not. Try for yourself.Originally Posted by dainese
yes it uses more fuel on the AWD too, and I"m surprised at how much more - almost 30% as it constantly accelerates then back off, and accelerates again to match the set speed - I think the cruise control could be tuned with better in-build intelligence. I don't use it.Originally Posted by Disciple
Magna AWD TJ2 Sports 2003
Thornlie, Perth, WA
nah, thats ok.Originally Posted by Disciple
but why?
As stated above...Originally Posted by dainese
Originally Posted by Joukowski
yeah but it shouldnt fluctuate that much. unless you are on a very uneven/hilly road.
Thats the only time you will use less by not using cruise.....and even by not using cruise I couldnt be bother driving 1000k n saving 0.05l per 100 just from not using it... gimme cruise anydayOriginally Posted by dainese
Whoops forgot why i came in here....
Just drove from Emerald too Brissy, total 1024k's averaged 8.7l at average speed of 101k/hr
undefined
** Busy as a One Legged man in an arse kicking competition**
I don't know how I pulled this but I'm nortorious for pulling some crazy ****!
670km out of a full tank of petrol!!!!!!!!!!!!
Originally Posted by magnarama
I managed 690 yesterday
Stock (so far as i know, minus a 3" muffler)
EDIT: Highway drive, average of 120-130 km/h
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)